Please notice the delay pedal effect would be better recorded in stereo, in any case I should also consider the price difference, if it worth it. Maybe I could use the headphone output to be able to listen to the track while I record, and the 2 line outputs on the back to re-amp? Or do I need to get the 4i4 Focusrite? I'm considering these 2 models, of course there is a big difference in price, so I would like to get the Focusrite 2i2, but not sure if with those 2 line outputs would be enough, So based on these infos, how many output/inputs I would need to have in my audio interface? My sound card is the newest version of the Audient ID14. I have been trying for two nights to get this to work and I don’t know what the block is, but I just can’t seem to get this to work. I would like, if possible, to be able to not switch cables and do re-amping in the second step after recording, but I would like to be able to do that simultaneusly, with that I mean recording the clean track while reamping at the same time, because I would need to hear the Boss DD-200 effect while I record the track. Hey Guys I am in desperate need of some guidance on how to re-amp a dry signal through a reamp box and a Two Notes Torpedo Captor X using Cubase 11. I'm just a bit struggling to understand which one would better fit for my needs. Now, I have read that instead of buying a re-amp box, I could use whatever Boss pedal (like my boss tuner for instance) as a reamp box, because apparently it has the same functionality, watch the video here:Īlso, since I have an interface with only one input, it's a really basic Seinberg UR12, I would need to buy a new audio interface so that with 2 inputs/outputs I can re-amp it. If I place the delay effect before the audio interface and before getting into my daw the guitar will be recorded with the delay, not clean, this means that if I would like to change the delay settings after recording for some reason (like delay time, intensity, type or whatever) or maybe because I notice some mistake, I will need to record everything again, while if I re-amp the delay I can re-play the clean track recorded in my daw, and re-amp it back with the delay where I would be free to change the settings. The effects should sound better after distortion (amp sim in my DAW) as it is usually placed at the end of the signal chain Now I would like to use my DD-200 Boss pedal as an effect instead of the plugins within the DAW.įor convenience I would like to be able to re-amp the delay effect for the following reasons: That's been my experience.So I'm recording at home my guitar with Cakewalk, using an Amp sim in within the DAW from Overloud. But in use, they've kept better signal integrity without coloration and noise than other solutions. Though they will both set you back a few bucks. My reamp run is about 50 ft from amp to control room, so noise control was a factor. Then I got some Edcor trannies and made another box based on the Jensen schemats. Originally, I used a simple schemat found online that literally had like 3 or 4 total components (a few resistors and a pot). If you turn down the send from within PT, you get a nice ocean type sound behind the signal. And if you are running out of a 192 IO, the level will usually over-saturate the DI transformer. A passive DI box in reverse can mess with the tone. I would consider it a good tool that can save you $$ down the line. It conditions the signal properly volume wise and noise wise. Without getting all technical, the reamp box isn't just a Cadillac way of re-amping.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |